tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post8516480973368597858..comments2024-03-22T08:04:05.869-07:00Comments on 魚之樂: 哲學和武學Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-85465929292731892392010-03-01T22:30:38.046-08:002010-03-01T22:30:38.046-08:00哲學打架是哲學的樂趣之一。自省當然重要,但跟我所說的無抵觸。哲學打架是哲學的樂趣之一。自省當然重要,但跟我所說的無抵觸。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-79059245990759147962010-03-01T22:12:51.320-08:002010-03-01T22:12:51.320-08:00哲學拿來打架? 有點剎風景.
要打, 不如往內. 放棄過去的價值和成見, 比打低眼前對手重要得多.哲學拿來打架? 有點剎風景.<br />要打, 不如往內. 放棄過去的價值和成見, 比打低眼前對手重要得多.willsinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13511522581504937498noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-72118693778775404052010-02-26T21:38:56.531-08:002010-02-26T21:38:56.531-08:00套路恐怕沒有了,但基本路數還是有的,例如教他們如何提出counterexamples,如何建構par...套路恐怕沒有了,但基本路數還是有的,例如教他們如何提出counterexamples,如何建構parallel argument以顯示對方的argument有問題,如何扮懵要求對方澄清用語或概念,如何運用reductio ad absurdum等等。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-11558578818777341882010-02-26T20:10:05.263-08:002010-02-26T20:10:05.263-08:00如果讀哲學同練功夫一樣,咁你有冇哲學套拳(除左讀邏輯及哲學史之外不太具體說法之外)可以比你o的學生同...如果讀哲學同練功夫一樣,咁你有冇哲學套拳(除左讀邏輯及哲學史之外不太具體說法之外)可以比你o的學生同時可以練功同練武?到同人對打(作哲學討論)時可以有基本路數,不用好似細路仔打交咁?Yanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05543452661425487649noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-73227738318995168232010-02-26T02:34:27.713-08:002010-02-26T02:34:27.713-08:00「讀哲學讀到只會拋出一堆堆術語和理論,卻對哲學問題沒有深入的了解,就是花拳繡腿,只能騙騙外行的人。」...「讀哲學讀到只會拋出一堆堆術語和理論,卻對哲學問題沒有深入的了解,就是花拳繡腿,只能騙騙外行的人。」<br /><br />That is what exactly 'shallow learning' is about...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-7734155855346933232010-02-25T23:44:05.884-08:002010-02-25T23:44:05.884-08:00我所說的不適用於天才。我所說的不適用於天才。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-67944066976594052852010-02-25T23:33:58.523-08:002010-02-25T23:33:58.523-08:00→讀哲學而不搞通基本的邏輯學和弄清楚哲學史的來龍去脈,就如學武術而不練馬步和腰勁,腰馬不合一,練多久...→讀哲學而不搞通基本的邏輯學和弄清楚哲學史的來龍去脈,就如學武術而不練馬步和腰勁,腰馬不合一,練多久也不會練出真功夫來。<br /><br />不過,維根斯坦本人的哲學史功底也是很可疑的。。。CYChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17991632320213950106noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-83816462821877016742010-02-25T22:43:39.224-08:002010-02-25T22:43:39.224-08:00這本書我幾年前看了,相當好看;最有趣是目擊者的記憶竟截然不同。這本書我幾年前看了,相當好看;最有趣是目擊者的記憶竟截然不同。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-38690320414560674152010-02-25T22:36:41.116-08:002010-02-25T22:36:41.116-08:00我買了這本Wittgenstein' Poker(http://www.amazon.com...我買了這本Wittgenstein' Poker(http://www.amazon.com/Wittgensteins-Poker-Ten-Minute-Argument-Philosophers/dp/0060936649/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1267165860&sr=8-1)。<br />成本書講一段士林逸事,有一晚哲學家小聚,W 和 Karl Popper同場,兩人爭論一個問題,興過火炭,W 嬲到拎起一支撥火爐的鐵叉,想插Popper!Chrishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10133122741874926109noreply@blogger.com