tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post551807783298634759..comments2024-03-22T08:04:05.869-07:00Comments on 魚之樂: 拒抗宿命Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger28125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-34912946130526348612013-02-17T04:50:48.671-08:002013-02-17T04:50:48.671-08:00同情理解,所以我絕對不會接受宿命論。同情理解,所以我絕對不會接受宿命論。Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-676577184279991752013-02-16T13:06:18.286-08:002013-02-16T13:06:18.286-08:00//其實思考越多,越發現人生無意義//
- 也許如此。另一方面,不思考者相信亦不會被人生意義的問題...//其實思考越多,越發現人生無意義//<br /><br />- 也許如此。另一方面,不思考者相信亦不會被人生意義的問題困擾。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-71933640292105403502013-02-14T20:48:54.502-08:002013-02-14T20:48:54.502-08:00其實思考越多,越發現人生無意義。雖然很荒謬,但這也是一種循環,回歸原點。其實思考越多,越發現人生無意義。雖然很荒謬,但這也是一種循環,回歸原點。Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17657234248954081639noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-88864095836595581452013-02-14T20:44:21.763-08:002013-02-14T20:44:21.763-08:00這小毛子一定是年青人,只要多長點見識,便明白天命不可違,一切都是注定,無可能改變,努力是徒勞無功。
...這小毛子一定是年青人,只要多長點見識,便明白天命不可違,一切都是注定,無可能改變,努力是徒勞無功。<br /><br />如果要反駁宿命論,某程度上你可以這樣回答:「你出生時是男對不對?你將來都會是男,會變成老伯伯。你要反抗宿命,後天努力會不會變成女人,可以懷孕產子?」<br />「你出生在美國,是白人。如果你反對宿命又如何?你後天努力會變成另一個人種嗎?沒可能。」<br />而且改變未來,等同未來可以改變過去,有違時間悖論。在反駁之前先解決時間悖論比較好。即使是用平行世界假說,但另一個世界自有另一套悸論,還是沒法扭轉原本世界的事情。<br /><br />好多事由開始之前已經注定好結局,改不了。Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17657234248954081639noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-59131739296142991002013-02-12T08:30:23.597-08:002013-02-12T08:30:23.597-08:00//我想講的是:宿命論的論証,若果只是一種概念遊戲,則那位同學不必迷失在其論証的結果裏面。//
-...//我想講的是:宿命論的論証,若果只是一種概念遊戲,則那位同學不必迷失在其論証的結果裏面。//<br /><br />- 如果推論正確,前提全真,便不應隨便以「概念遊戲」來打發掉。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-27854385673610298272013-02-12T06:29:58.169-08:002013-02-12T06:29:58.169-08:00其實哲學家係咪時常諗D現實上根本冇咩可能發生O既事來討論?
如果真是這樣,那麼該女生冇需咁在意丫...其實哲學家係咪時常諗D現實上根本冇咩可能發生O既事來討論? <br /><br />如果真是這樣,那麼該女生冇需咁在意丫. <br /><br />利申:未提過論證內容<br /><br />yuiAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-24833801135433026982013-02-12T01:50:47.651-08:002013-02-12T01:50:47.651-08:00對不起,寫漏了概念遊戲的重點。
我想講的是:宿命論的論証,若果只是一種概念遊戲,則那位同學不必迷失在...對不起,寫漏了概念遊戲的重點。<br />我想講的是:宿命論的論証,若果只是一種概念遊戲,則那位同學不必迷失在其論証的結果裏面。當然,這推論不是哲學,只是人生感悟。<br />如有不敬,請多多包涵!<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-75247724170068148642013-02-11T18:07:51.785-08:002013-02-11T18:07:51.785-08:00同情理解,匿名朋友似乎將任何無法擺脫的自然現象或者生存條件,都算做宿命。同情理解,匿名朋友似乎將任何無法擺脫的自然現象或者生存條件,都算做宿命。路人noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-83858341650662591222013-02-10T22:17:46.948-08:002013-02-10T22:17:46.948-08:00I was a Christian since I was small, and I abandon...I was a Christian since I was small, and I abandon my belief in Christianity after I found that there is not any sound arguments for the existence of god in my philosophy class. However, interestingly, although I got a little bit upset at that time, I soon found that it is extremely comfortable for me to accept the lack of proof of god and agnostic atheism.Heimannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-16485287955826817452013-02-10T22:06:17.789-08:002013-02-10T22:06:17.789-08:00宿命論的論證當然屬於哲學。宿命論的論證當然屬於哲學。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-26177899469899936712013-02-10T22:05:07.047-08:002013-02-10T22:05:07.047-08:00Yes, if fatalism is true...Yes, if fatalism is true...W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-88233125433446599582013-02-10T22:04:33.517-08:002013-02-10T22:04:33.517-08:00其實認命也不簡單,如何認?認了又怎樣?其實認命也不簡單,如何認?認了又怎樣?W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-90387971123377278592013-02-10T22:02:45.484-08:002013-02-10T22:02:45.484-08:00??????W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-35212209418952562722013-02-10T22:02:23.945-08:002013-02-10T22:02:23.945-08:00謝謝。謝謝。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-60408840517331785812013-02-10T21:04:05.312-08:002013-02-10T21:04:05.312-08:00偶然看到一篇文章提及一位哲學教授反對迷失於哲學概念的遊戲。想請問王教授宿命論的論證是哲學概念的一種嗎...偶然看到一篇文章提及一位哲學教授反對迷失於哲學概念的遊戲。想請問王教授宿命論的論證是哲學概念的一種嗎?(先申報我還未看過論證內容,不過想先了解它的本質)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-82310535324758393042013-02-09T21:19:12.841-08:002013-02-09T21:19:12.841-08:00Maybe she is destined to not to accept fatalism. ...Maybe she is destined to not to accept fatalism. It's just impossible for her to go against her own fate. LOLHeimannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-83233663019180443162013-02-09T21:10:52.915-08:002013-02-09T21:10:52.915-08:00If fatalism is true, then whether a person accepti...If fatalism is true, then whether a person accepting fatalism or not has been determined by his/her own fate, isn't it?Heimannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-42711769058914162062013-02-09T19:40:48.753-08:002013-02-09T19:40:48.753-08:00那女小生吾认命,所以对宿命论有代入感,当找吾到反駁這個宿命論論證的方法,自然upset。
吾认命是动...那女小生吾认命,所以对宿命论有代入感,当找吾到反駁這個宿命論論證的方法,自然upset。<br />吾认命是动力source,后生人甘早要认命好难。<br />事实上人好渺少.......<br /><br />TLAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-78938765915926756372013-02-09T10:19:17.239-08:002013-02-09T10:19:17.239-08:00住在有個太陽跟月亮的地球也是個宿命。住在有個太陽跟月亮的地球也是個宿命。Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-17478477372777604522013-02-09T09:31:10.067-08:002013-02-09T09:31:10.067-08:00新年快樂!多謝教授一直以來的好文章!
講起宿命嘛,記得有人講過,在哲學導論課上,有某位教授不斷解拆...新年快樂!多謝教授一直以來的好文章!<br /><br />講起宿命嘛,記得有人講過,在哲學導論課上,有某位教授不斷解拆人生有意義之類的論述,判斷為無意義之談,然後有個同學下個學期就退學了。可想而知,他可能是為了追尋或思考人生意義而去讀哲學的。路人noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-60308074462622339722013-02-08T23:52:42.160-08:002013-02-08T23:52:42.160-08:00你寫得有趣。對,打錯字,而改正了,謝謝。你寫得有趣。對,打錯字,而改正了,謝謝。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-19456890921512614422013-02-08T23:51:28.056-08:002013-02-08T23:51:28.056-08:00可是,哲學總不能完全跟自己的生命脫節。可是,哲學總不能完全跟自己的生命脫節。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-16348425299165562722013-02-08T23:50:32.894-08:002013-02-08T23:50:32.894-08:00沒讀過,但他討論的 Richard Taylor 我會教。沒讀過,但他討論的 Richard Taylor 我會教。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-40425942690217955602013-02-08T23:49:53.982-08:002013-02-08T23:49:53.982-08:00正是。正是。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-27154660144154616732013-02-08T23:45:38.806-08:002013-02-08T23:45:38.806-08:00//我向學生解釋了 Horwich 的論點有何不妥後,便補充說他反駁的那個宿命論論證其實不是那麼容易...//我向學生解釋了 Horwich 的論點有何不妥後,便補充說他反駁的那個宿命論論證其實不是那麼容易應付,接著用了一個更簡單的方式將論證再解釋一次。//<br /><br />「....便補充說他反駁的那個宿命論論證其實不是那麼容易應付....」,相信她是很著緊你,急你之所急,她看見連她....(一時想不出用什麼形容詞)的老師也說「不是那麼容易應付」,豈有不急之理?<br />而你說「要是你最終反駁不了這個宿命論論證,也許你便應該接受宿命論了。」這對她可能是雙重打擊,因為「反駁不了」已經是輸了一回,還要來個「便應該接受」,幾乎等於是「落井下石」,真係唔「缩命」都「攞命」的.... :)<br /><br />(btw:「這拒抗半身不是哲學,」“半”相信是打錯字,應為“本”?)<br />神洲http://gmue2008.mysinablog.com/noreply@blogger.com