tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post4716598441298773730..comments2024-03-22T08:04:05.869-07:00Comments on 魚之樂: 網上無賴多衰人Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger22125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-20439685628729396062016-05-22T21:06:29.420-07:002016-05-22T21:06:29.420-07:00大陆管troll叫“喷子”,和原意还是很切合的。大陆管troll叫“喷子”,和原意还是很切合的。Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-17689670675114631502016-04-27T01:24:11.744-07:002016-04-27T01:24:11.744-07:00「那麼文章的客觀論證及結論」,你指那篇心理學論文?還是我這篇文章?「那麼文章的客觀論證及結論」,你指那篇心理學論文?還是我這篇文章?W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-42448013123990319702016-04-26T17:49:30.283-07:002016-04-26T17:49:30.283-07:00//由於這方面的研究甚少,值得參考的自然也很少,於是這個算得上嚴謹的研究便很值得參考//
// 雖然...//由於這方面的研究甚少,值得參考的自然也很少,於是這個算得上嚴謹的研究便很值得參考//<br />// 雖然這只是一個研究,不足以成為定論,但至少可以用來支持「網上無賴多衰人」這個看法。//<br />若祗說:值得參考或支持看法,那麼文章的客觀論證及結論在那裡?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-85583407309001734082016-04-26T10:16:56.532-07:002016-04-26T10:16:56.532-07:00多口講句,上面第一個英文留言可見怨氣,好像是找機會來罵人,此外也多文法錯誤,何不用中文寫?多口講句,上面第一個英文留言可見怨氣,好像是找機會來罵人,此外也多文法錯誤,何不用中文寫?KCnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-66830850967456912742016-04-26T07:26:46.767-07:002016-04-26T07:26:46.767-07:00錯與對是看你站在哪個角度而言,很多時不同的人對同一個議題會有各自認為是對或錯等不同的結論,也可能會出...錯與對是看你站在哪個角度而言,很多時不同的人對同一個議題會有各自認為是對或錯等不同的結論,也可能會出現包括「人身攻擊」在內各種不同反應,所以有「加拿大三位心理學家最近在學術期刊 Personality and Individual Differences 聯合發表了一篇論文,....」。<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-47402595279502063472016-04-26T01:20:55.734-07:002016-04-26T01:20:55.734-07:00A. LimA. LimAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-79600719845087518302016-04-26T01:18:14.720-07:002016-04-26T01:18:14.720-07:00王教授你做錯了什麼,或得罪了什麼人,好好的一篇討論互聯網上一現象的文章,也會引得人來對你人身攻擊?王教授你做錯了什麼,或得罪了什麼人,好好的一篇討論互聯網上一現象的文章,也會引得人來對你人身攻擊?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-7103018469411468602016-04-25T23:35:57.656-07:002016-04-25T23:35:57.656-07:00陳述「網上無賴多衰人」這樣一個事實存在並不等於就是說自身就沒有缺點;也顯然並不等於就是否定自身可能有...陳述「網上無賴多衰人」這樣一個事實存在並不等於就是說自身就沒有缺點;也顯然並不等於就是否定自身可能有的缺點。<br /><br />否則因為任何人自身都永遠不可能沒有缺點的話,那豈不是任何人都因此而不能夠陳述事實存在?<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-51661723230252417582016-04-25T23:10:43.606-07:002016-04-25T23:10:43.606-07:00「多」不是「是」的意思。
「紅顏多薄命」不等於「紅顏是薄命」;
「阿媽是女人」不能夠說成是「阿媽多女...「多」不是「是」的意思。<br />「紅顏多薄命」不等於「紅顏是薄命」;<br />「阿媽是女人」不能夠說成是「阿媽多女人」。<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-22524426731405385002016-04-25T19:30:56.665-07:002016-04-25T19:30:56.665-07:00網上無賴估計有不少是精神病患者, 正常的時候, 他們的心地可能不差, 未必是衰人, 更不一定是政棍梁...網上無賴估計有不少是精神病患者, 正常的時候, 他們的心地可能不差, 未必是衰人, 更不一定是政棍梁振英等賤人.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-12577333047777406672016-04-25T19:06:45.648-07:002016-04-25T19:06:45.648-07:00無賴不一定是衰人,因為「無賴」主要指行為,「衰人」則是指品格;說「他這人很無賴,但不是個衰人」並沒有...無賴不一定是衰人,因為「無賴」主要指行為,「衰人」則是指品格;說「他這人很無賴,但不是個衰人」並沒有自相矛盾。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-77413957832456581672016-04-25T17:58:13.342-07:002016-04-25T17:58:13.342-07:00無賴當然是衰人,說網上無賴多衰人,和說阿媽是女人有什麼分別?無賴當然是衰人,說網上無賴多衰人,和說阿媽是女人有什麼分別?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-90049316773576006812016-04-25T08:36:25.370-07:002016-04-25T08:36:25.370-07:00不用客氣。不用客氣。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-80638625245066921672016-04-25T08:26:56.834-07:002016-04-25T08:26:56.834-07:00謝謝解說謝謝解說Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-73726789823562268502016-04-25T08:26:24.766-07:002016-04-25T08:26:24.766-07:00例如一件案件的目擊證人所說的不是定論,卻可以被視為證據,支持指控。
如果是定論,那就不只是支持,而...例如一件案件的目擊證人所說的不是定論,卻可以被視為證據,支持指控。<br /><br />如果是定論,那就不只是支持,而是證明了。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-90023242758849197002016-04-25T08:22:43.127-07:002016-04-25T08:22:43.127-07:00不是筆誤。我的意思是:由於這方面的研究甚少,值得參考的自然也很少,於是這個算得上嚴謹的研究便很值得參...不是筆誤。我的意思是:由於這方面的研究甚少,值得參考的自然也很少,於是這個算得上嚴謹的研究便很值得參考;換句話說,假如有很多同類研究,這個研究便未必這麼值得參考。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-4136530613518256882016-04-25T07:47:30.542-07:002016-04-25T07:47:30.542-07:00也許是筆誤 //到目前為止,這方面的研究甚少,因此,這個方"面"算得上嚴謹的研究...也許是筆誤 //到目前為止,這方面的研究甚少,因此,這個方"面"算得上嚴謹的研究很值得參考//Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-12541876307097845512016-04-25T03:39:38.831-07:002016-04-25T03:39:38.831-07:00//論文裏甚至有這一句:"it might be said that online tro...//論文裏甚至有這一句:"it might be said that online trolls are prototypical everyday sadists" (p.101) !雖然這只是一個研究,不足以成為定論,但至少可以用來支持「網上無賴多衰人」這個看法。//<br />不足以成為定論,邏輯上何來支持?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-72925159606054997312016-04-25T03:35:51.770-07:002016-04-25T03:35:51.770-07:00//到目前為止,這方面的研究甚少,因此,這個方法算得上嚴謹的研究很值得參考//
有甚麼邏輯關係? ...//到目前為止,這方面的研究甚少,因此,這個方法算得上嚴謹的研究很值得參考//<br /><br />有甚麼邏輯關係? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-5664165155966586782016-04-25T03:21:12.867-07:002016-04-25T03:21:12.867-07:00正常人在閱讀別人文章時,會留心自我觀點是否出錯,再小心回覆,避免顯出自己的不小心或愚昧,亦為對方留些...正常人在閱讀別人文章時,會留心自我觀點是否出錯,再小心回覆,避免顯出自己的不小心或愚昧,亦為對方留些地步,好確定相方討論立場及空間。Internet trolling 是 "Me Me Me" 先行。內容嘛,已不是重點。Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-81632896425560513172016-04-25T02:07:21.451-07:002016-04-25T02:07:21.451-07:00Oh please!Oh please!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-10554185689315160882016-04-25T00:51:37.629-07:002016-04-25T00:51:37.629-07:00" He who fights monsters should see to it tha..." He who fights monsters should see to it that he does not become a monster."<br /><br />---- Beyond Good and Evil ~ Freidrich Nietzsche.<br /><br />The present piece of your blog writing, ironically, demonstrates that you who point the finger at those practicing what you call net trolling, are actually perpetrating the same crime resenting with those caustic words when you find yourself seemingly challenged unfairly, or even vulgarly, while the truth is that you refuse bluntly to acknowledge your flaws.<br /><br />If the ultimate concern of your blog is simply to showcase your wisdom, which must not be negatively commented upon , what's the point allowing others to leave reponses, especially anonymously? Then it would be better shutting down the blog so that weeknesses of the blogger would never be exposed, if his writings only serve to reveal his arrogance and the lack of modesty, which is hard to detect as he would be gentleman-like provided that he does not meet any sharp challenges, as mentioned by Mister Wong's present writing.<br /><br />You conspiracy theory on negative comments will only further reveal your extent of tolerance and blindness.<br /><br />Please take Nietzsche's advice lest you turn yourself to the net scoundrels you disdain that much.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com