tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post2382960725283092457..comments2024-03-22T08:04:05.869-07:00Comments on 魚之樂: 世界級思想家陳馮富珍Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger26125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-70025871907955662692013-04-11T23:56:09.176-07:002013-04-11T23:56:09.176-07:00//呢個我唔肯定,我只係指出當世衛總幹事同有傑出成就是兩回事。//
我不反對雞珍當上世衛總幹事是一種...//呢個我唔肯定,我只係指出當世衛總幹事同有傑出成就是兩回事。//<br />我不反對雞珍當上世衛總幹事是一種成就﹐關鍵是你從哪角度來說。<br />我反而一直不理解的是﹐怎麼可將世衛總幹事列入思想家﹖<br />難道雞珍的管理方式背後﹐反映出某一種別樹一格的管理思維或理念﹖<br /><br />//冇解㗎,唔鍾意就唔鍾意。//<br />有無韭菜﹐唔鍾意點可以無理由﹖<br />不過﹐這句有著一陣發爛渣的味道﹐嗯﹐我中意。(笑)文少http://jonathan_sky.mysinablog.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-56106514082944157572013-04-11T15:04:43.776-07:002013-04-11T15:04:43.776-07:00"[...] the victory of Margaret Chan in the WH..."[...] the victory of Margaret Chan in the WHO DG election was regarded as a remarkable achievement of Chinese diplomacy and proof of an innovative approach by the former Leninist state." (from <a href="http://business.highbeam.com/5477/article-1G1-189952580/borrowing-hong-kong-identity-chinese-diplomacy-implications" rel="nofollow">"Borrowing the Hong Kong identity for Chinese diplomacy: implications of Margaret Chan's World Health Organization election campaign"</a>)W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-27733441845884653832013-04-11T14:27:45.491-07:002013-04-11T14:27:45.491-07:00你怎知中國出了不少力的?你怎知中國出了不少力的?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-29296808688330709722013-04-10T14:31:12.974-07:002013-04-10T14:31:12.974-07:00//即係你覺得雞珍查實係個低能﹖本当に﹖//
- 呢個我唔肯定,我只係指出當世衛總幹事同有傑出成就...//即係你覺得雞珍查實係個低能﹖本当に﹖//<br /><br />- 呢個我唔肯定,我只係指出當世衛總幹事同有傑出成就是兩回事。<br /><br />//我反而有興趣你點解唔中意個「佼」字﹖//<br /><br />- 冇解㗎,唔鍾意就唔鍾意。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-5613512609519453922013-04-10T09:02:05.511-07:002013-04-10T09:02:05.511-07:00//假如派個低能的去當世衛總幹事﹐一切蕭規曹隨或交由手下搞掂,此人也算在衛生政策有傑出成就?//
即...//假如派個低能的去當世衛總幹事﹐一切蕭規曹隨或交由手下搞掂,此人也算在衛生政策有傑出成就?//<br />即係你覺得雞珍查實係個低能﹖本当に﹖<br /><br />//我不喜歡那個「佼」字,甚少用,「表表者」不算錯吧。//<br />「佼佼者」一詞明顯誕生了近二千年﹐覺得近代發展出「表表者」一語﹐我覺得很多餘。<br />我反而有興趣你點解唔中意個「佼」字﹖文少http://jonathan_sky.mysinablog.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-56932736671888198842013-04-09T10:09:00.246-07:002013-04-09T10:09:00.246-07:00在大陸,打造世界级乜乜就好多!
到 google china searching 「世界級思想家」,...在大陸,打造世界级乜乜就好多!<br />到 google china searching 「世界級思想家」,孔子、(冇老毛、老鄧份)、中式馬克思...都上榜。其它都是外國人。<br />2011年美国《外交政策》杂志全球百大思想家名单出炉 周小川跻身第十,政界人物方面,美国总统奥巴马位居第11,太出奇了!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-31422885122428021012013-04-08T21:52:30.790-07:002013-04-08T21:52:30.790-07:00我不喜歡那個「佼」字,甚少用,「表表者」不算錯吧。我不喜歡那個「佼」字,甚少用,「表表者」不算錯吧。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-14508090888298198872013-04-08T21:51:27.460-07:002013-04-08T21:51:27.460-07:00文少,
//世衛總幹事﹐職責就係管理世衛﹐她「在自己的領域」中就是搞好世衛
你個意思是否指她當選的...文少,<br /><br />//世衛總幹事﹐職責就係管理世衛﹐她「在自己的領域」中就是搞好世衛<br />你個意思是否指她當選的幾年間﹐世衛好廢無表現﹖對改善全球衛生無貢獻﹖定係世衛本來就係廢的﹐她成為一個垃圾組織的總幹事﹐算個球的成就﹖//<br /><br />- 假如派個低能的去當世衛總幹事﹐一切蕭規曹隨或交由手下搞掂,此人也算在衛生政策有傑出成就?W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-79047669131378886362013-04-08T20:21:49.703-07:002013-04-08T20:21:49.703-07:00她坐上這個位,中國出了不少力(相信其中有不少討價還價)。她坐上這個位,中國出了不少力(相信其中有不少討價還價)。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-67198347701851052252013-04-08T20:19:29.439-07:002013-04-08T20:19:29.439-07:00糊塗至此?糊塗至此?W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-35216939708233962812013-04-08T19:48:56.655-07:002013-04-08T19:48:56.655-07:00Meshi﹕
已查表表﹐何不查「佼佼」﹖﹐亦不查「佼」的單字意思﹖
用返你查的漢典網頁查「佼佼」﹐最...Meshi﹕<br />已查表表﹐何不查「佼佼」﹖﹐亦不查「佼」的單字意思﹖<br />用返你查的漢典網頁查「佼佼」﹐最早有「佼佼者」一例﹐是《後漢書》〈劉玄劉盆子傳〉﹕<br />帝曰:「卿所謂鐵中錚錚,傭中佼佼者也。」張賢注﹕「言佼佼者,凡佣之人稍為勝也。」<br />http://www.zdic.net/cd/ci/8/ZdicE4ZdicBDZdicBC333831.htm<br /><br />再查《後漢書》﹐確有此句﹕<br />帝曰:「卿所謂鐵中錚錚,傭中佼佼者也。」又曰:「諸卿大為無道,所過皆夷滅老弱,溺社稷,汙井灶。然猶有三善:攻破城邑,周遍天下,本故妻婦無所改易,是一善也;立君能用宗室,是二善也;餘賊立君,迫急皆持其首降,自以為功,諸卿獨完全以付朕,是三善也。」乃令各與妻子居洛陽,賜宅人一區,田二頃。<br />http://ctext.org/hou-han-shu/liu-xuan-liu-pen-zi-lie-zhuan/zh (第36段)<br /><br />再查﹐「佼」一字之意﹕<br />《廣韻》﹕庸人(此庸乃金之傭)之敏銳<br />http://ctext.org/library.pl?if=gb&file=77412&page=67#37<br /><br />《康熙字典》﹕記<br />《韻會》《正韻》古巧切,��音攪。好也。《詩·��風》佼人僚兮。陸氏作姣。《揚子·方言》自關而東,河濟之閒,凡好謂之佼。<br />http://ctext.org/library.pl?if=gb&file=77415&page=101#01<br /><br /><br />你引述辭典上之三例﹐唐﹑明兩例是「表表」﹐寫成「表表者」的﹐只有晚清民國時期的姚茫父。最早有「佼佼者」一例則在《後漢書》〈劉玄劉盆子傳〉﹕﹐而「佼」字本身﹐則有「好也」之意。<br />你認為邊個先算係正寫﹖文少http://jonathan_sky.mysinablog.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-11526563842948370672013-04-08T11:33:10.902-07:002013-04-08T11:33:10.902-07:00表表
卓异,特出。 唐 韩愈 《祭柳子厚文》:“子之自著,表表愈伟。”《明史·李三才传》:“若...表表 <br /> <br />卓异,特出。 唐 韩愈 《祭柳子厚文》:“子之自著,表表愈伟。”《明史·李三才传》:“若 顾宪成 、 邹元标 、 赵南星 、 刘宗周 ,皆表表为时名臣。” 姚华 《论文后编》:“两 宋 及 元 ,皆循 唐 风:肆者亦低首於 韩 、 柳 ,谨者率降心於 王 、 杨 ; 子京 或似 长卿 , 永叔 乃法 子长 。其表表者,如是而已。” <br />http://www.zdic.net/cd/ci/8/ZdicE8ZdicA1ZdicA816658.htmMeshinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-72267998229353904772013-04-08T02:57:47.049-07:002013-04-08T02:57:47.049-07:00我對陳馮並不熟悉.
但觀乎她得到世衛總幹事的職位, 還在上年成功連任, 也許外界對她的評價與香港輿論...我對陳馮並不熟悉.<br />但觀乎她得到世衛總幹事的職位, 還在上年成功連任, 也許外界對她的評價與香港輿論普遍對她的評價不同.<br />蝮https://www.blogger.com/profile/15838174598652684605noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-6623442983492806322013-04-08T00:28:33.806-07:002013-04-08T00:28:33.806-07:00就係好深奧﹐
世衛總幹事﹐職責就係管理世衛﹐她「在自己的領域」中就是搞好世衛
你個意思是否指她當選的...就係好深奧﹐<br />世衛總幹事﹐職責就係管理世衛﹐她「在自己的領域」中就是搞好世衛<br />你個意思是否指她當選的幾年間﹐世衛好廢無表現﹖對改善全球衛生無貢獻﹖<br />定係世衛本來就係廢的﹐她成為一個垃圾組織的總幹事﹐算個球的成就﹖<br /><br />btw﹐佼佼者﹐點解會變成表表者呢﹖又係一個奇點。文少http://jonathan_sky.mysinablog.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-31848091822070243662013-04-07T21:14:01.930-07:002013-04-07T21:14:01.930-07:00可能那些評選人把「世界級知名度」當成了「世界級思想家」了。
可能那些評選人把「世界級知名度」當成了「世界級思想家」了。<br />神洲http://gmue2008.mysinablog.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-55754179089659468742013-04-07T11:26:52.211-07:002013-04-07T11:26:52.211-07:00有乜咁深奧?「她雖然當了幾年世衛總幹事,但在衛生政策上並沒有傑出的成就」是矛盾句嗎?有乜咁深奧?「她雖然當了幾年世衛總幹事,但在衛生政策上並沒有傑出的成就」是矛盾句嗎?W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-14539134025465287272013-04-07T07:19:42.433-07:002013-04-07T07:19:42.433-07:00 ‘world thinkers’應譯為「世界級空想家」. ‘world thinkers’應譯為「世界級空想家」.Quality Alchemisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15897649108440475806noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-56639413947162362452013-04-07T05:30:34.936-07:002013-04-07T05:30:34.936-07:00建議你加個category: 古怪現像建議你加個category: 古怪現像Yanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05543452661425487649noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-80648318379145966002013-04-07T05:05:57.719-07:002013-04-07T05:05:57.719-07:00Is it a joke? 陳馮富珍, 'world thinker'? How i...Is it a joke? 陳馮富珍, 'world thinker'? How is that possible? <br /><br />Her name is seen side by side with Michael Sandel, Martha Nussbaum, Richard Dawkins, Peter Higgs and Slavoj Žižek? (they are the only persons that I know from the list, forgive my ignorance) <br /><br />Has 陳馮富珍 said anything that really changes the way we look at the world? I can only remember she reminded us that it was safe to eat chicken before the outbreak of SARS years ago. <br />I think she has got the credit she doesn't deserve. <br /><br />Thanks for sharing with us this joke!<br /> Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-70835764992215167612013-04-07T02:34:46.495-07:002013-04-07T02:34:46.495-07:00你就努力拿思想家獎!你就努力拿思想家獎!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-39076724944404336722013-04-07T02:29:43.659-07:002013-04-07T02:29:43.659-07:00世衛的貢獻?世衛的貢獻?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-41465299455104096992013-04-07T02:16:59.804-07:002013-04-07T02:16:59.804-07:00潛台詞是否等於﹕
世衛的存在﹐對改善全球衛生是沒貢獻﹐或沒甚麼傑出貢獻﹖潛台詞是否等於﹕<br />世衛的存在﹐對改善全球衛生是沒貢獻﹐或沒甚麼傑出貢獻﹖文少http://jonathan_sky.mysinablog.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-2991221613063715092013-04-07T02:06:03.940-07:002013-04-07T02:06:03.940-07:00又﹐比起我時常見到一個個活人拎終身成就獎
雞珍拎呢個獎真係小巫見大巫。(爆)又﹐比起我時常見到一個個活人拎終身成就獎<br />雞珍拎呢個獎真係小巫見大巫。(爆)文少http://jonathan_sky.mysinablog.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-65994607508976996752013-04-07T02:03:52.602-07:002013-04-07T02:03:52.602-07:00有時深奧呀,文少!
有時深奧呀,文少!<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-4477106739398104672013-04-07T02:03:44.784-07:002013-04-07T02:03:44.784-07:00評審團是否有眼無珠, 留待時間證明, 但在偌大的中國, 現今人才的確匱乏.評審團是否有眼無珠, 留待時間證明, 但在偌大的中國, 現今人才的確匱乏.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com