tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post2143525064372596834..comments2024-03-22T08:04:05.869-07:00Comments on 魚之樂: 迫學生閱讀Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger40125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-19572238804880241472012-09-12T22:48:51.964-07:002012-09-12T22:48:51.964-07:00//做哲學博士仍然要讀書,做榮譽個隻先唔使。//
這正是香港這個金錢世界弔詭之處
要讀書得來的哲學博...//做哲學博士仍然要讀書,做榮譽個隻先唔使。//<br />這正是香港這個金錢世界弔詭之處<br />要讀書得來的哲學博士﹐沒甚麼榮譽可言﹐讀的東西很多時被人視作冷知識﹐讀書人被人視作書呆子<br />不用讀書得來的榮譽博士﹐卻有權有勢﹐視作成功人士﹐大學還要為頒發這些榮譽學位而隆重其事﹐但頒獎禮的開銷﹐卻是由我們貧苦大眾的稅金比的。文少http://jonathan_sky.mysinablog.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-76332990638800530972012-09-12T22:43:32.830-07:002012-09-12T22:43:32.830-07:00//如果係咁,我咪判斷錯誤囉。//
我成日同你講﹐
甚麼文如其人﹐只有用真名發明的才算準
網上的﹐不...//如果係咁,我咪判斷錯誤囉。//<br />我成日同你講﹐<br />甚麼文如其人﹐只有用真名發明的才算準<br />網上的﹐不可玩這套<br /><br />不信﹐你看看曹捷早期在左派文藝雜誌寫的文<br />你都不敢相信這是出自現在化名陶傑的曹捷之手。<br />文少http://jonathan_sky.mysinablog.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-44088127884152897852012-09-12T10:17:47.582-07:002012-09-12T10:17:47.582-07:00//你話啦﹐要做哲學博士﹐洗乜讀書叻先得?//
- 做哲學博士仍然要讀書,做榮譽個隻先唔使。//你話啦﹐要做哲學博士﹐洗乜讀書叻先得?//<br /><br />- 做哲學博士仍然要讀書,做榮譽個隻先唔使。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-46326905661958819272012-09-12T10:15:58.659-07:002012-09-12T10:15:58.659-07:00//你唔比我查實係你同行﹐我之前講的一切都是老作﹖//
- 如果係咁,我咪判斷錯誤囉。//你唔比我查實係你同行﹐我之前講的一切都是老作﹖//<br /><br />- 如果係咁,我咪判斷錯誤囉。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-8657908015719450042012-09-12T10:10:32.935-07:002012-09-12T10:10:32.935-07:00//Would writing a 900 word 讀後感 be more difficult t...//Would writing a 900 word 讀後感 be more difficult than writing a summary?//<br /><br />- I don't think so.W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-87575198734424744662012-09-12T04:17:31.323-07:002012-09-12T04:17:31.323-07:00//This is how I see it. 資=money. 資質=money is essen...//This is how I see it. 資=money. 資質=money is essence.//<br />哦﹐你發現了一個真理<br />李嘉誠沒讀過大學﹐一樣拿榮譽社會科學博士同榮譽法學博士<br />你話啦﹐要做哲學博士﹐洗乜讀書叻先得㗎﹖<br />呢個世界﹐只有窮鬼先要讀書先做到博士<br />有錢佬﹐唔讀書都做博士﹐仲要突登搞個頒獎禮來隆重其事~~(爆)文少http://jonathan_sky.mysinablog.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-84074758465848761172012-09-12T04:11:54.938-07:002012-09-12T04:11:54.938-07:00洗乜玩神秘啊﹖
一個覺得哲學無用﹑覺得教哲學不過是一群熱愛自吹自擂混飯吃的人﹐點會適合讀哲學﹖
仲...洗乜玩神秘啊﹖<br />一個覺得哲學無用﹑覺得教哲學不過是一群熱愛自吹自擂混飯吃的人﹐點會適合讀哲學﹖<br /><br />仲有﹐而家你唔係睇一個學生的資質﹐係睇緊一個網友﹐一個素未謀面的人﹐請問你點斷定我實際如何﹖<br />你唔比我查實係你同行﹐我之前講的一切都是老作﹖文少http://jonathan_sky.mysinablog.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-62341308862184388592012-09-12T03:27:38.782-07:002012-09-12T03:27:38.782-07:00//Summary 唔同讀後感呀!// Would writing a 900 word 讀後感 ...//Summary 唔同讀後感呀!// Would writing a 900 word 讀後感 be more difficult than writing a summary? --zpdrmnAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-54729676386376184712012-09-11T22:45:03.346-07:002012-09-11T22:45:03.346-07:00係 提多句
"就算冇天份 都唔好灰心 你依然可以享受哲學既樂趣"係 提多句<br />"就算冇天份 都唔好灰心 你依然可以享受哲學既樂趣"小子noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-72897998266921078062012-09-11T22:39:23.342-07:002012-09-11T22:39:23.342-07:00唔會係虛心受教 理解力強
新諗頭多 個d衰野啊=.=??
記得寫完篇野提一句
"唔好因為...唔會係虛心受教 理解力強<br />新諗頭多 個d衰野啊=.=??<br />記得寫完篇野提一句<br />"唔好因為自己符合上文哲學資質條件而自滿<br />咁樣 你又會變成唔適合讀哲學既人"<br />警惕大家同自己都好小子noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-59832045595766883542012-09-11T21:56:34.238-07:002012-09-11T21:56:34.238-07:00Yan,
遲些寫篇短文講一講。Yan,<br /><br />遲些寫篇短文講一講。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-68277963777526886722012-09-11T21:10:17.095-07:002012-09-11T21:10:17.095-07:00//資質喎,點睇咖?// This is how I see it. 資=money. 資質=mon...//資質喎,點睇咖?// This is how I see it. 資=money. 資質=money is essence. 文少 probably agrees. BTW, 風水佬 only wants your money. --zpdrmn Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-54201865463251401572012-09-11T20:46:16.746-07:002012-09-11T20:46:16.746-07:00資質喎,點睇咖?資質喎,點睇咖?Yanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05543452661425487649noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-28220247756293572152012-09-11T17:00:50.144-07:002012-09-11T17:00:50.144-07:00學你話齋:不用言說,只能領會。
我睇學生資質真係仲勁過風水佬咖!學你話齋:不用言說,只能領會。<br /><br />我睇學生資質真係仲勁過風水佬咖!W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-34095669388671010302012-09-11T15:56:28.215-07:002012-09-11T15:56:28.215-07:00你只係憑同我網上傾下閒偈﹐你就知我哲學資質唔高
做教授果然唔同D﹐簡直仲勁過風水佬
我想﹐你大概又會...你只係憑同我網上傾下閒偈﹐你就知我哲學資質唔高<br />做教授果然唔同D﹐簡直仲勁過風水佬<br />我想﹐你大概又會瞎扯甚麼文如其人的觀點吧...文少http://jonathan_sky.mysinablog.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-49209946996409395962012-09-10T12:36:27.271-07:002012-09-10T12:36:27.271-07:00的確係冇乜前途,至於你,有冇前途你都唔應該讀,因為你嘅哲學資質唔高(唔等如話你智力唔高或唔夠聰明)。...的確係冇乜前途,至於你,有冇前途你都唔應該讀,因為你嘅哲學資質唔高(唔等如話你智力唔高或唔夠聰明)。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-57529311664390380162012-09-10T07:48:06.368-07:002012-09-10T07:48:06.368-07:00無論係summary定讀後感﹐結果都係無人報
之後會唔會比人cut經費呢﹖我就唔知啦。(爆)
仲有...無論係summary定讀後感﹐結果都係無人報<br />之後會唔會比人cut經費呢﹖我就唔知啦。(爆)<br /><br />仲有﹐你大可以放心<br />如果我有機會讀大學的話﹐肯定唔會讀哲學lor<br />你話啦﹐讀哲學有咩前途可言呢﹖(哀)文少http://jonathan_sky.mysinablog.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-3206696187962814052012-09-09T23:17:11.172-07:002012-09-09T23:17:11.172-07:00Summary 唔同讀後感呀!好彩你唔係我學生,唔係就俾你激死。Summary 唔同讀後感呀!好彩你唔係我學生,唔係就俾你激死。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-33655624231387973672012-09-09T22:26:16.018-07:002012-09-09T22:26:16.018-07:00你呢個方法在而家的港大文學院﹐一定行不通
人家2nd yr先揀major﹐如果大家知哲學系有科必修個...你呢個方法在而家的港大文學院﹐一定行不通<br />人家2nd yr先揀major﹐如果大家知哲學系有科必修個教授要人寫10篇1千字讀後感﹐肯定無人揀哲學系讀。<br />雖然香港的事實本來就是...無咩人會揀哲學讀(爆)文少http://jonathan_sky.mysinablog.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-70457325782137924922012-09-06T18:58:37.020-07:002012-09-06T18:58:37.020-07:00That's all right.That's all right.W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-43770801926417537522012-09-06T09:56:50.601-07:002012-09-06T09:56:50.601-07:00Prof., I was teasing, sorry. ;)
-49erProf., I was teasing, sorry. ;)<br /><br />-49erAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-73652068651939904732012-09-05T21:14:45.783-07:002012-09-05T21:14:45.783-07:00That's J. L. Austin, not Jane Austen, and the ...That's J. L. Austin, not Jane Austen, and the book is <i>Sense and Sensibilia</i>, not <i>Sense and Sensibility</i>.W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-52245299255047619742012-09-05T11:52:43.339-07:002012-09-05T11:52:43.339-07:00"J. L. Austin, Sense and Sensibilia, Chapters..."J. L. Austin, Sense and Sensibilia, Chapters III & V"<br /><br />In your opinion, which movie abduction is the best? :D<br /><br />Thanks for the list. I will start by rereading S&S, since on the surface it is the non-philosophical work. I wonder why you had included it.<br /><br /> -49erAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-69191051638935106802012-08-31T23:44:48.334-07:002012-08-31T23:44:48.334-07:00必修牙,咁就無修lor. --zpdrmn必修牙,咁就無修lor. --zpdrmnAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-75268488123788990472012-08-31T22:12:49.743-07:002012-08-31T22:12:49.743-07:00貴精不貴多。貴精不貴多。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.com