tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post1906003662046372401..comments2024-03-22T08:04:05.869-07:00Comments on 魚之樂: 創新和進步Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger62125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-66390584620413998112015-09-05T01:54:54.357-07:002015-09-05T01:54:54.357-07:00暗示原屬精神病
竟為理據荒唐鏡
理屈詞窮無以對
鸚鵡難保五毛命
暗示原屬精神病<br />竟為理據荒唐鏡<br />理屈詞窮無以對<br />鸚鵡難保五毛命<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-23685906748402125482015-09-05T00:32:26.277-07:002015-09-05T00:32:26.277-07:00養來鸚鵡語初成
終日巧學人認名
可憐禽雀偷人語
自創無由空悲嗚
養來鸚鵡語初成<br />終日巧學人認名<br />可憐禽雀偷人語<br />自創無由空悲嗚<br />Horaihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06715189567035745891noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-4090487502622569132015-09-04T22:25:50.106-07:002015-09-04T22:25:50.106-07:00欲加之罪暗示成
邪惡小人扮神靈
廢言萬千長又臭
眾生面前現原形
欲加之罪暗示成<br />邪惡小人扮神靈<br />廢言萬千長又臭<br />眾生面前現原形<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-12129268124730816692015-09-04T21:36:23.988-07:002015-09-04T21:36:23.988-07:00善福惡禍自招成
何須事事問神靈
千言萬語辯虛實
留與眾生自分明善福惡禍自招成<br />何須事事問神靈<br />千言萬語辯虛實<br />留與眾生自分明Horaihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06715189567035745891noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-6704126581861317752015-09-04T21:01:19.171-07:002015-09-04T21:01:19.171-07:00原來Horai經常亂up嘢係因為收到暗示。。。唉!
原來Horai經常亂up嘢係因為收到暗示。。。唉!<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-52645753788823325792015-09-04T20:42:50.317-07:002015-09-04T20:42:50.317-07:00如果暗示就可以證明有事實存在的話,那麼信徒說他們得到神的暗示那豈不是就可以證明神有事實存在?
如果暗示就可以證明有事實存在的話,那麼信徒說他們得到神的暗示那豈不是就可以證明神有事實存在?<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-87566807170813486342015-09-04T20:41:05.898-07:002015-09-04T20:41:05.898-07:00我笑他人看不穿。我笑他人看不穿。Horaihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06715189567035745891noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-53096392121856343622015-09-04T20:29:11.373-07:002015-09-04T20:29:11.373-07:00你是時候入青山了。
你是時候入青山了。<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-1318423665951380642015-09-04T20:17:46.903-07:002015-09-04T20:17:46.903-07:00我手執鋼刀九十九,殺盡膠人方罷休。。。我手執鋼刀九十九,殺盡膠人方罷休。。。Horaihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06715189567035745891noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-81943027584161139112015-09-04T19:36:24.435-07:002015-09-04T19:36:24.435-07:00經常收到「暗示」是精神分裂症患者的一個明顯特徵。
經常收到「暗示」是精神分裂症患者的一個明顯特徵。<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-74384075366786862152015-09-04T18:08:09.104-07:002015-09-04T18:08:09.104-07:00以例暗示,bad choice of example.以例暗示,bad choice of example.Horaihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06715189567035745891noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-35312083766473307642015-09-04T07:16:30.782-07:002015-09-04T07:16:30.782-07:00文章有否定電子書進步?
文章有否定電子書進步?<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-17804172835483953142015-09-04T02:30:32.253-07:002015-09-04T02:30:32.253-07:00電子書=進步。其他=睇係乜。
我決定玩鬥短。電子書=進步。其他=睇係乜。<br /><br />我決定玩鬥短。Horaihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06715189567035745891noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-67812011841262849972015-09-03T23:02:44.142-07:002015-09-03T23:02:44.142-07:00既然文章內容無錯,咁你對創新和進步的觀點和角度又如何?你認為創新就必定是進步?
既然文章內容無錯,咁你對創新和進步的觀點和角度又如何?你認為創新就必定是進步?<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-92225904854691203772015-09-03T22:41:42.436-07:002015-09-03T22:41:42.436-07:00@匿名(10:03):王先生篇文又唔係 statement of facts,點可能有對錯?只有觀點...@匿名(10:03):王先生篇文又唔係 statement of facts,點可能有對錯?只有觀點與角度分歧。Horaihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06715189567035745891noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-40662122570845192102015-09-03T22:32:43.070-07:002015-09-03T22:32:43.070-07:00藥廠研發出一種新嘅藥物係唔係就等於進步你睇下FDA點樣先會批准或不批准那種新藥上市就知道『我們便不會...藥廠研發出一種新嘅藥物係唔係就等於進步你睇下FDA點樣先會批准或不批准那種新藥上市就知道『我們便不會那麼過分簡單地將創新和進步等同起來了。』<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-60050454534552242582015-09-03T22:03:49.215-07:002015-09-03T22:03:49.215-07:00你噏嚟噏去無非係想話王先生篇文章有錯啫?咁文章裡面邊句話係錯呀?
你噏嚟噏去無非係想話王先生篇文章有錯啫?咁文章裡面邊句話係錯呀?<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-43561128040262386502015-09-03T21:52:37.636-07:002015-09-03T21:52:37.636-07:00而家係咪有人否定 “任何事都有利弊” 先?
而家係咪有人否定 “任何事都有利弊” 先?<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-53663876380814361392015-09-03T21:48:42.750-07:002015-09-03T21:48:42.750-07:00王先生的文章有否定 “任何事都有利弊”?
王先生的文章有否定 “任何事都有利弊”?<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-7368322547818277732015-09-03T21:36:43.006-07:002015-09-03T21:36:43.006-07:00//電子書之弊屬王先生私人//?
你老豆老母冇親筆寫有眉批的書係咪就等於全世界啲老豆老母都冇先?
依...//電子書之弊屬王先生私人//?<br />你老豆老母冇親筆寫有眉批的書係咪就等於全世界啲老豆老母都冇先?<br />依家有人話唔寫眉批就等於唔愛你?<br />睇嚟你有幻覺!<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-45498399550888174582015-09-03T21:34:33.438-07:002015-09-03T21:34:33.438-07:00拗的是論點,for argument sake 玩吓,nothing personal。鬼佬就明這文...拗的是論點,for argument sake 玩吓,nothing personal。鬼佬就明這文化。中國文化就猜疑你[批評]到底是有什麼[企圖]。。。唉。<br /><br />凡事有利有弊,只要利多於弊(對公眾而言),就是進步。有什麼難?資本社會每天都在做這判斷。所有進步都帶代價,此是 universally true statement,阿媽是女人論!醫學界有種藥類叫[last resort medicines],即藥性非常毒,治療性亦不特別高,醫生不到別無選擇了不用它。世界很多進步的類別一樣,有百利而99害,僅差1我們還是叫進步。Horaihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06715189567035745891noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-23572835907743206222015-09-03T19:54:29.479-07:002015-09-03T19:54:29.479-07:00我真不知有什麼好批評,王教授沒有否認創新有得也可能有失,他說進步是變得更好,只要整體來說變得更好就是...我真不知有什麼好批評,王教授沒有否認創新有得也可能有失,他說進步是變得更好,只要整體來說變得更好就是進步了,為什麼不可以有不好的一面?以我的理解,他認為有時整體的好壞很難判斷,那就是創新未必是進步的情況了。Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-74069918953479604672015-09-03T19:17:46.582-07:002015-09-03T19:17:46.582-07:00要說電腦禍害,我簡直可以出書!這方面我想大家不用浪費那5分鐘去查,心理都有點頭緒。顧住[玩]電腦,p...要說電腦禍害,我簡直可以出書!這方面我想大家不用浪費那5分鐘去查,心理都有點頭緒。顧住[玩]電腦,physical communication breakdown,addiction(通常但不止於玩電子遊戲),health issues(腰酸背痛手抽筋)等等等等。。Horaihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06715189567035745891noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-20560808031777530232015-09-03T18:37:30.262-07:002015-09-03T18:37:30.262-07:00王先生的文章不是說[若利大過弊]就是進步,因為以電子書為例,電子書之弊屬王先生私人,你們大家有父親親...王先生的文章不是說[若利大過弊]就是進步,因為以電子書為例,電子書之弊屬王先生私人,你們大家有父親親筆寫有眉批的書嗎?沒有的,我們的父母愛我們較少嗎?當然不是。唉。Horaihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06715189567035745891noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-2975063043953642242015-09-03T18:28:39.551-07:002015-09-03T18:28:39.551-07:00唉!任何事都有利弊。係[任何]。3 分鐘之網上搜索:
The National Highway T...唉!任何事都有利弊。係[任何]。3 分鐘之網上搜索:<br /><br />The National Highway Transportation and Safety Administration reported 238 deaths caused by airbags between 1990 and 2002. All of these deaths occurred in low-speed crashes, making it apparent that the airbag was responsible for the deaths. Mary C. Meyer, a statistician at the University of Georgia, points out that there is probably a much higher rate of airbag-related deaths, but because these occur in high-speed crashes, the fatalities are attributed to the impact of the collision. <br /><br />Who Wants Airbags?<br />http://www.amstat.org/newsroom/pdfs/whowantsairbags.pdf<br /><br />這救,是人命(要先有嚴重車禍),殺,也是人命(low-impact collision, far more likely to happen)。。。<br /><br />今時今日,我就勸矮過五呎高過六呎三嘅咪坐前座嘞。。。信不信由你。<br />Horaihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06715189567035745891noreply@blogger.com