tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post1301786733082816709..comments2024-03-22T08:04:05.869-07:00Comments on 魚之樂: 引號Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger25125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-57549535994543226632012-09-22T10:49:10.141-07:002012-09-22T10:49:10.141-07:00Thank you. 明白。Thank you. 明白。Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-43820733270574023532012-09-22T10:40:55.357-07:002012-09-22T10:40:55.357-07:001. 有開始的『,怎可以沒有結尾的』?數學裏的 )))) 你會不會認為累贅?
2. 我的一貫用法是...1. 有開始的『,怎可以沒有結尾的』?數學裏的 )))) 你會不會認為累贅?<br /><br />2. 我的一貫用法是單篇用〈〉,書本用《》。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-37281619914110061192012-09-22T09:40:43.237-07:002012-09-22T09:40:43.237-07:00奇怪,Wong Sir 說 :『可以這樣,但你這句不是引文,我會寫成:「下一篇是不是〈省略號〉?」』...奇怪,Wong Sir 說 :『可以這樣,但你這句不是引文,我會寫成:「下一篇是不是〈省略號〉?」』。<br />1. 最尾的」』好累赘?<br />2. 〈省略號〉是否應改為《省略號》?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-84328636755689442942012-09-21T22:02:14.511-07:002012-09-21T22:02:14.511-07:00可以用手寫版,或用以下輸入法網頁:http://www.cantoneseinput.com/可以用手寫版,或用以下輸入法網頁:<a href="http://www.cantoneseinput.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cantoneseinput.com/</a>W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-67900041874941395912012-09-21T13:53:38.611-07:002012-09-21T13:53:38.611-07:00我想問:你是怎麼打那些引號的?美國的電腦鍵盤沒有中文用的引號啊。我想問:你是怎麼打那些引號的?美國的電腦鍵盤沒有中文用的引號啊。Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-84488915092018681162012-09-19T08:12:57.496-07:002012-09-19T08:12:57.496-07:00(B)法是引文已有引號時便用雙引號,否則用單引號,只要大家都這樣用,便不會混淆。
『』雖然叫雙引號...(B)法是引文已有引號時便用雙引號,否則用單引號,只要大家都這樣用,便不會混淆。<br /><br />『』雖然叫雙引號,但是沒有「雙重引用」的意思(而只是用來識別與「」不同),否則,無論用在引文裏面還是外端,意思都是不通的。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-2746701602339496372012-09-19T01:00:48.009-07:002012-09-19T01:00:48.009-07:00(A)法者,單引用「」,(B)法者,單引用『』,如此才相稱。否則若用引號標對話,豈不混亂。
而梁文...(A)法者,單引用「」,(B)法者,單引用『』,如此才相稱。否則若用引號標對話,豈不混亂。<br /><br />而梁文道之例,是中共習慣。若以中共習慣例,則應改成 "有些報章乾脆把 '日本' 二字列為禁忌"。中共橫書不用「」<br /><br />但「」 ""混同不是沒有,日文就這樣用。但他們的用法與中文不同,不能以一論之。杜生之http://jysnow.pixnet.netnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-32539865171308781912012-09-18T23:03:12.984-07:002012-09-18T23:03:12.984-07:00放心0_0""
學李輝話齋 巧合推論姐~
咁用唔代表投共既XD
咁岩得咁橋姐放心0_0""<br />學李輝話齋 巧合推論姐~<br />咁用唔代表投共既XD<br />咁岩得咁橋姐小子noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-66675225134967407852012-09-18T21:37:38.048-07:002012-09-18T21:37:38.048-07:00I use B. But I don't write in Chinese that muc...I use B. But I don't write in Chinese that much. I use ... instead of ...... because I am lazy and it's greener. (The English writings I've read so far use ... Let's follow suit.) -zpdrmnAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-63277520709618914272012-09-18T21:10:55.282-07:002012-09-18T21:10:55.282-07:00//若用(B)法,則單引就須用『』,所以事實上兩種方式都會改變引號。//
- 你是先假定了(A)的...//若用(B)法,則單引就須用『』,所以事實上兩種方式都會改變引號。//<br /><br />- 你是先假定了(A)的用法為正確,用(B)時才有所謂「改變引號」。<br /><br />//至於梁文道的用法,不符合中文標點符號的使用方式。既用了「」,就不應出現 “”,要改成『』。//<br /><br />- 「」是我用的,不能歸到梁文道頭上。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-15170795503991263382012-09-18T19:24:53.924-07:002012-09-18T19:24:53.924-07:00若用(B)法,則單引就須用『』,所以事實上兩種方式都會改變引號。這種用法早年有好些出版社採用,比如皇...若用(B)法,則單引就須用『』,所以事實上兩種方式都會改變引號。這種用法早年有好些出版社採用,比如皇冠出版社早期的出版品。<br /><br />至於梁文道的用法,不符合中文標點符號的使用方式。既用了「」,就不應出現 “”,要改成『』。<br /><br />中文標點符號原本是參考歐文標點符號而成,這種規範相信也是歐文的規範,中文只是蕭規曹隨而已。杜生之http://jysnow.pixnet.netnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-50412640394377295932012-09-18T17:43:47.276-07:002012-09-18T17:43:47.276-07:00但王教授不是說(B)也可以,而是論證(A)不合理。但王教授不是說(B)也可以,而是論證(A)不合理。Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-60099704376031297012012-09-18T17:29:31.144-07:002012-09-18T17:29:31.144-07:00吓?記得小學都有教過只要內外唔同,外單內雙同外雙內單都係正確寫法喎,只不過大部份人都習慣外單內雙咁解...吓?記得小學都有教過只要內外唔同,外單內雙同外雙內單都係正確寫法喎,只不過大部份人都習慣外單內雙咁解。咁我諗唔需要講到引用內容入面都有引號,a b句引號用法都OK。名越拉岸 CopyLionhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13652813328248583927noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-60866137453027227942012-09-18T17:21:15.148-07:002012-09-18T17:21:15.148-07:00好彩都唔錯得哂,不過投咗共自己都唔知!好彩都唔錯得哂,不過投咗共自己都唔知!W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-65772519730308249512012-09-18T17:20:19.882-07:002012-09-18T17:20:19.882-07:00為甚麼要讀到單引號才知是引文?假如大家都採取我的用法,那麼無論是單引號或雙引號,見到引號便知道是引文...為甚麼要讀到單引號才知是引文?假如大家都採取我的用法,那麼無論是單引號或雙引號,見到引號便知道是引文。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-43679045812264970582012-09-18T17:15:13.870-07:002012-09-18T17:15:13.870-07:00這是擇懶固執。(還有,你引文前不會先看嗎?)這是擇懶固執。(還有,你引文前不會先看嗎?)W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-46703209441986771402012-09-18T17:13:50.497-07:002012-09-18T17:13:50.497-07:00可以這樣,但你這句不是引文,我會寫成:「下一篇是不是〈省略號〉?」可以這樣,但你這句不是引文,我會寫成:「下一篇是不是〈省略號〉?」W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-85479846023484489312012-09-18T13:41:51.839-07:002012-09-18T13:41:51.839-07:00Meshi: Fascinating info, thanks dude. I am tempted...Meshi: Fascinating info, thanks dude. I am tempted to compare those two styleguides to discover the differences are between the two "authorities."<br /><br />One Chinese language, two expressions. ;)<br /><br />-49er<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-13736422719678666712012-09-18T12:23:52.886-07:002012-09-18T12:23:52.886-07:00王sir投共了!王sir投共了!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-84085083327125679352012-09-18T10:58:31.425-07:002012-09-18T10:58:31.425-07:00根據《中华人民共和国国家标准标点符号用法》,「4.8.5 引號裡面還要用引號時,外面一層用雙引號,...根據《中华人民共和国国家标准标点符号用法》,「4.8.5 引號裡面還要用引號時,外面一層用雙引號,裡面一層用單引號。」另外直行文稿「引號改用雙引號 "『』" 和單引號 "「」"。」<br /><br />王Sir的用法與內地直行文稿引號用法相同。Meshinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-186906395962233952012-09-18T10:54:23.500-07:002012-09-18T10:54:23.500-07:00//Is there any Chinese equivalent of an editorial ...//Is there any Chinese equivalent of an editorial style guide such as "The Chicago Manual of Style"?//<br /><br />Maybe this:<br />中华人民共和国国家标准标点符号用法<br />http://www.cmi.hku.hk/ref/article/article08/index.html<br /><br />and this:<br /><br />教育部國語推行委員會編著,《重訂標點符號手冊》修訂版。中華民國97年12月。<br />http://www.edu.tw/files/site_content/m0001/hau/h6.htmMeshinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-63348627493884847012012-09-18T10:31:19.708-07:002012-09-18T10:31:19.708-07:00Is there any Chinese equivalent of an editorial st...Is there any Chinese equivalent of an editorial style guide such as "The Chicago Manual of Style"?<br /><br />http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/home.html<br /><br />-49erAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-67593255378269178602012-09-18T10:00:34.236-07:002012-09-18T10:00:34.236-07:00我也認為a的使用比較合理,讀者在讀的時候會先讀到單引號,知道是引文,然後再讀到雙引號,知道是引文中引...我也認為a的使用比較合理,讀者在讀的時候會先讀到單引號,知道是引文,然後再讀到雙引號,知道是引文中引文,讀起來應該較流暢。Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06283316426295147389noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-48529064849912944382012-09-18T09:51:36.895-07:002012-09-18T09:51:36.895-07:00我又擇善固,我一向認為 A 比較實用合理,因為用 A 不用事先搞清楚引內容而一律用單引號;而用 B ...我又擇善固,我一向認為 A 比較實用合理,因為用 A 不用事先搞清楚引內容而一律用單引號;而用 B 就麻煩些:如果引文根本沒引號,就要用回單引號,即是,用 B 要事先看引文有沒引號。Yanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05543452661425487649noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-55178054814621124342012-09-18T09:38:21.020-07:002012-09-18T09:38:21.020-07:00我說:『下一篇係未叫「省略號」?』
教授 你係未會贊成咁用0_0""??我說:『下一篇係未叫「省略號」?』<br />教授 你係未會贊成咁用0_0""??小子noreply@blogger.com