tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post1004090169983943231..comments2024-03-22T08:04:05.869-07:00Comments on 魚之樂: 論中西學術短長Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger30125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-33089836602141810462014-03-07T15:47:03.588-08:002014-03-07T15:47:03.588-08:00的確是我搞錯了,是梁啟超才對。謝謝!的確是我搞錯了,是梁啟超才對。謝謝!W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-25626756502744782692014-03-07T12:36:54.556-08:002014-03-07T12:36:54.556-08:00網上有人說是指梁啟超,請問會否是他所錯了?網上有人說是指梁啟超,請問會否是他所錯了?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-38266631672690890252012-12-29T04:35:29.585-08:002012-12-29T04:35:29.585-08:00z大:
算係啦+_+"
知道該門學科缺少左邊方面既訓練
或者佢既訓練會衍生咩不足之處z大:<br />算係啦+_+"<br />知道該門學科缺少左邊方面既訓練<br />或者佢既訓練會衍生咩不足之處小子noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-79928576872354912902012-12-20T21:17:24.585-08:002012-12-20T21:17:24.585-08:00為何說「華人學人那麼喜歡泛談泛論」?似乎西人學人也不見得其所說的就不是泛談泛論?為何說「華人學人那麼喜歡泛談泛論」?似乎西人學人也不見得其所說的就不是泛談泛論?神洲http://gmue2008.mysinablog.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-45992583266662424962012-12-20T07:48:18.638-08:002012-12-20T07:48:18.638-08:00//何故華人學人那麼喜歡泛談泛論呢?// <---泛談泛論華人學人. Just Kidding...//何故華人學人那麼喜歡泛談泛論呢?// <---泛談泛論華人學人. Just Kidding.<br /> --zpdrmnAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-20583732511533255732012-12-20T07:40:21.924-08:002012-12-20T07:40:21.924-08:00What is //瞭如指掌,十分清楚//? Scratching my head.
Includ...What is //瞭如指掌,十分清楚//? Scratching my head. <br />Including seeing their limitations? --zpdrmnAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-2599924991019158192012-12-20T02:27:56.334-08:002012-12-20T02:27:56.334-08:00咁就用「看透」啦...orz
話時話
有冇人可以比較得宜姐=0=?咁就用「看透」啦...orz<br />話時話<br />有冇人可以比較得宜姐=0=?小子noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-6540599359285639462012-12-20T00:26:03.464-08:002012-12-20T00:26:03.464-08:00假如你對物理學和生物學都「瞭如指掌,十分清楚」,算不算是看通物理學和生物學?假如你對物理學和生物學都「瞭如指掌,十分清楚」,算不算是看通物理學和生物學?W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-69969830704632683122012-12-19T23:25:45.365-08:002012-12-19T23:25:45.365-08:00對中西兩方哲學
瞭如指掌 十分清楚
看通--->十分了解
唔可以咁用嗎@.@a對中西兩方哲學<br />瞭如指掌 十分清楚<br />看通--->十分了解<br />唔可以咁用嗎@.@a小子noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-47161993157683643312012-12-19T23:15:43.091-08:002012-12-19T23:15:43.091-08:00問起我了。問起我了。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-24822730423993711152012-12-19T23:14:47.762-08:002012-12-19T23:14:47.762-08:00其實我不太清楚「看通中西哲學」是甚麼意思。其實我不太清楚「看通中西哲學」是甚麼意思。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-30693977269289132592012-12-19T23:13:27.280-08:002012-12-19T23:13:27.280-08:00比較唔一定要話「各有所長、亦各有所短」,可以比較完之後仍是認為中國人高幾皮。比較唔一定要話「各有所長、亦各有所短」,可以比較完之後仍是認為中國人高幾皮。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-62487964976353616262012-12-19T23:08:51.979-08:002012-12-19T23:08:51.979-08:00同意。同意。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-79855462207409356502012-12-19T23:05:49.922-08:002012-12-19T23:05:49.922-08:00我也聽聞有這情況。我也聽聞有這情況。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-5950075759643397682012-12-19T23:04:06.351-08:002012-12-19T23:04:06.351-08:00自己閉門比較是一回事,著書立說、煞有介事搞比較研究則是另一回事。自己閉門比較是一回事,著書立說、煞有介事搞比較研究則是另一回事。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-44302624522639925632012-12-19T14:13:53.917-08:002012-12-19T14:13:53.917-08:00何故華人學人那麼喜歡泛談泛論呢?何故華人學人那麼喜歡泛談泛論呢?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-82707536895532693012012-12-19T09:26:42.851-08:002012-12-19T09:26:42.851-08:00王老前輩
目前而言
係未仲未有人看通中西哲學?
會唔會係冇可能做到既事/_\
ps:話佢地發緊春秋大...王老前輩<br />目前而言<br />係未仲未有人看通中西哲學?<br />會唔會係冇可能做到既事/_\<br />ps:話佢地發緊春秋大夢(妄想)<br />你真係有種= ="b小子noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-13130385828804361112012-12-19T08:08:51.414-08:002012-12-19T08:08:51.414-08:00不管他是急不及待還是耐心等待,能夠去比較應該也是一種求知和擴闊視野的開始,總比閉門造車好吧?不管他是急不及待還是耐心等待,能夠去比較應該也是一種求知和擴闊視野的開始,總比閉門造車好吧?神洲http://gmue2008.mysinablog.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-36849240134299783452012-12-19T06:43:32.368-08:002012-12-19T06:43:32.368-08:00王教授:
會唔會唔係你咁諗呢?當陣時棄中取西之風甚盛,講吓中西各有所長、亦各有所短嚟平衡下,已經好忍...王教授:<br />會唔會唔係你咁諗呢?當陣時棄中取西之風甚盛,講吓中西各有所長、亦各有所短嚟平衡下,已經好忍手嘅嘞;唔係就好似熊先生咁話,唓,比乜較呀?梗係先秦諸子勁哂啦。會唔會係咁呀?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-48461807976921539772012-12-18T21:07:24.902-08:002012-12-18T21:07:24.902-08:00不過有些中國學者,稍稍涉獵予一點西方哲學的皮毛,就急不及待的著書立說,說看穿了人家的弊病,要用中國哲...不過有些中國學者,稍稍涉獵予一點西方哲學的皮毛,就急不及待的著書立說,說看穿了人家的弊病,要用中國哲學去補救一下。Chrishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10133122741874926109noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-87430527415352570002012-12-18T21:05:04.819-08:002012-12-18T21:05:04.819-08:00用英文向外國介紹的,陳榮捷(Wing-tsit Chan)的 A Source Book in Ch...用英文向外國介紹的,陳榮捷(Wing-tsit Chan)的 A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy以翻譯選段為主,有多少說明,是流行的參考書。Chrishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10133122741874926109noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-60731757971715700512012-12-18T20:33:54.840-08:002012-12-18T20:33:54.840-08:00其實中西之分、「中西學長短」是否真如此重要?我較重視particular ideas,重要的是你的看...其實中西之分、「中西學長短」是否真如此重要?我較重視particular ideas,重要的是你的看法,為甚麼你如此認為,和我自己怎樣回應,為甚麼我同意或不同意,大家又會如何回應對方的意見。籠統地講中學西學,又不能代表一個個別的哲學家的看法。gengarnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-24036782221023255022012-12-18T16:39:58.850-08:002012-12-18T16:39:58.850-08:00上中國文化堂,聽得最多就係「西方文化重知,中國文化重德」之類的一連串宏觀比較。這些講者講得出的西方思...上中國文化堂,聽得最多就係「西方文化重知,中國文化重德」之類的一連串宏觀比較。這些講者講得出的西方思想家,也許只有笛卡兒、康德、黑格爾、尼采幾人。<br /><br />又或者,講下Cassirer本An Essay on Man ,就叫做比較哲學咗。<br /> Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-56295164339801921542012-12-18T12:17:58.625-08:002012-12-18T12:17:58.625-08:00我是這樣覺得,中國有句俗話叫做「取長補短」,又說,「三人行,必有我師」。我認為不單在哲學上,在其它任...我是這樣覺得,中國有句俗話叫做「取長補短」,又說,「三人行,必有我師」。我認為不單在哲學上,在其它任何領域或學科上,中外之間,各國之間,都一定會互有長短。<br />而何謂長,何謂短,就像何謂高,何謂矮一樣,沒有比較,亦就不知道自己的缺點和優點,亦就難以改進缺點和發揚優點。<br />所以,學人之所長,補己之所短,其實是不失為一個加快進步的方法。<br /><br />而至於怎樣才是正確的比較和怎樣比較,以及在「學無止境」之下如何界定膚淺和廣博等等,相信均不應用來否定比較。<br />神洲http://gmue2008.mysinablog.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-43753689688924380972012-12-18T10:35:44.459-08:002012-12-18T10:35:44.459-08:00I am probably the wrong person to ask.I am probably the wrong person to ask.W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.com