tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post6615392396433738501..comments2024-03-22T08:04:05.869-07:00Comments on 魚之樂: 夜半無人自省時Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger70125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-56420153015436276552013-04-06T10:56:11.709-07:002013-04-06T10:56:11.709-07:00文少,
非凡的理解能力:
//我公司忙果陣﹐你地幾時見我上網嘈嘈貢﹖(爆)// is a quest...文少,<br />非凡的理解能力:<br />//我公司忙果陣﹐你地幾時見我上網嘈嘈貢﹖(爆)// is a question. It's not the same as //「忙便不得閒在此留言」//, which is a statement. <br />Of course you can say it's a rhetorical question, or it's meant to be a statement. But you don't say it out loud. So, I question your question. --zpdrmnAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-84444392389353517792013-04-06T09:25:44.006-07:002013-04-06T09:25:44.006-07:00呢段對答基情濃烈。(閃)呢段對答基情濃烈。(閃)Meshinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-19225825294056781832013-04-05T14:32:57.137-07:002013-04-05T14:32:57.137-07:00如果你說的「人」是指 persons,猩猩可能有「人性」。如果你說的「人」是指 persons,猩猩可能有「人性」。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-56967005984471232312013-04-05T13:14:16.807-07:002013-04-05T13:14:16.807-07:00//可以不是自我推翻,也不是自我肯定,而是跟自己的理念保持一定的心理距離。//
嘩~~你搞到我詩興...//可以不是自我推翻,也不是自我肯定,而是跟自己的理念保持一定的心理距離。//<br /><br />嘩~~你搞到我詩興大發﹐特寫一詩賀之<br /><br />詩《完全‧唔知‧你‧噏乜春》<br />當一個人的心理<br />竟然可以<br />存在一種不可告人的距離<br />看到這裡﹐忽然間﹐我隱約聞到<br />一陣沈旭暉的氣味<br />腦海中浮現出﹐他透過除下胸圍﹐完美地演繹<br />所謂‧的‧解扣主義文少http://jonathan_sky.mysinablog.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-39223512340190206232013-04-05T13:06:32.841-07:002013-04-05T13:06:32.841-07:00zpdrmn﹕
「忙便不得閒在此留言」﹐難道不蘊含「所有留言道是公司唔忙果陣」這意思﹖
你腦袋是甚麼...zpdrmn﹕<br />「忙便不得閒在此留言」﹐難道不蘊含「所有留言道是公司唔忙果陣」這意思﹖<br />你腦袋是甚麼構造﹐才有如此非凡的理解能力﹖(爆)文少http://jonathan_sky.mysinablog.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-45898717702660766822013-04-05T13:02:06.195-07:002013-04-05T13:02:06.195-07:00gengar﹕
嗯﹐其實我也贊同﹐如有自我認知能力的便算人性﹐猩猩也是人來的
我只問哲人王﹐贊不贊同...gengar﹕<br />嗯﹐其實我也贊同﹐如有自我認知能力的便算人性﹐猩猩也是人來的<br />我只問哲人王﹐贊不贊同猩猩有人性而已。(笑)文少http://jonathan_sky.mysinablog.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-76886395161769284272013-04-02T05:38:56.964-07:002013-04-02T05:38:56.964-07:00//猩猩算唔算係人﹖//
先跳過John Locke,有班認真的學者認為係,仲從道德角度幫猩猩爭取...//猩猩算唔算係人﹖//<br /><br />先跳過John Locke,有班認真的學者認為係,仲從道德角度幫猩猩爭取人權添:<br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Ape_Projectgengarnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-77443050663670835762013-03-31T12:16:22.037-07:002013-03-31T12:16:22.037-07:00Thanks.Thanks.W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-32962621548253175002013-03-31T12:15:23.969-07:002013-03-31T12:15:23.969-07:00//除非佢的反省﹐最終是推翻自己既有的一些理念
否則﹐佢所謂的反省﹐最終結果
會否只是淪為一種自我肯...//除非佢的反省﹐最終是推翻自己既有的一些理念<br />否則﹐佢所謂的反省﹐最終結果<br />會否只是淪為一種自我肯定﹖//<br /><br />- 可以不是自我推翻,也不是自我肯定,而是跟自己的理念保持一定的心理距離。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-72432773137096695962013-03-31T12:09:57.373-07:002013-03-31T12:09:57.373-07:00即係自己去讀 John Locke 本 An Essay Concerning Human Unde...即係自己去讀 John Locke 本 <i>An Essay Concerning Human Understanding</i> 啦!W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-84874275046093668342013-03-31T12:07:36.283-07:002013-03-31T12:07:36.283-07:00//一個學人在世﹐目的在求名﹑還是在求學﹖
寫著作﹐為啟迪後世﹐還是求寫甚麼爛鬼成名作﹖
有人竟還有...//一個學人在世﹐目的在求名﹑還是在求學﹖<br />寫著作﹐為啟迪後世﹐還是求寫甚麼爛鬼成名作﹖<br />有人竟還有臉提羅素﹐他當日寫書﹐是為谷階上位嘛﹖//<br /><br />- 文少總算有點見識喎!W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-74932515568300200152013-03-31T00:15:08.106-07:002013-03-31T00:15:08.106-07:00This birthday poem I wrote today reflected the min...This birthday poem I wrote today reflected the mind of middle age man. Like to share with Mr. Wong.<br /><br />Welcome to the 52nd Street<br /><br /><br />The traffic light is blinking in bright red<br /><br />When I come to the 52nd street without regret<br /><br />On the north side I find an old butchery<br /><br />Selling fresh cut meat with satiate fat<br /><br />On the south side I find a tiny bakery<br /><br />Selling spongy angel and dark devil<br /><br />Chocolate cakes lying side by side<br /><br />"Hurry up old man!"<br /><br />I give the driver yelling at me a big smile<br /><br />With a not so but still sharp enough glance<br /><br />Who care if today there is rainbow or not<br /><br />To the sky I proudly toss my hat<br /><br />To the beauty and the misery of life<br /><br />With my birthday wish way up high<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />老舍工https://www.blogger.com/profile/15261467063843602882noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-21779348083698578182013-03-30T23:53:18.488-07:002013-03-30T23:53:18.488-07:00文少,
//我公司忙果陣﹐你地幾時見我上網嘈嘈貢﹖(爆)// But you rarely tel...文少, <br />//我公司忙果陣﹐你地幾時見我上網嘈嘈貢﹖(爆)// But you rarely tell us 幾時係幾時唔係公司忙果陣. From now on, please state it every time you leave a comment. --zpdrmn (無聊)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-58641665321616797462013-03-30T23:41:39.209-07:002013-03-30T23:41:39.209-07:00文少,
Let's assume that I am talking about 齋行. ...文少, <br />Let's assume that I am talking about 齋行. At worst you wear out your shoes, but you are probably too tired and quit before that. 水窮 because of 齋行 is very hard.<br />成日陪條女行街行到坐看雲起時? What are you talking about? About hi佢auntie? <br />//水窮處﹐不是解找不到水的地方嘛﹖// That's too literal. I don't know that besides doing Tai Chi, Wong has a habit of walking to places without water. Let's ask him. <br />But we shouldn't take 行 literally either. Then how can one "行"到"水"窮處? --zpdrmnAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-8297954171845836212013-03-30T22:29:41.802-07:002013-03-30T22:29:41.802-07:00若果一個人的理念有經歷過自省之後仍變了一種自我肯定, 倒也無妨.
最可怕的是沒有進行過自省, 而自以...若果一個人的理念有經歷過自省之後仍變了一種自我肯定, 倒也無妨.<br />最可怕的是沒有進行過自省, 而自以為正確. 甚至可能隱約感到不妥, 但為了保護自己, 拒絕自省.蝮https://www.blogger.com/profile/15838174598652684605noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-68816566697262479692013-03-30T16:22:48.860-07:002013-03-30T16:22:48.860-07:00洗你滷味(wash your marinated food)!
我個個留言一9樣呀﹖洗你滷味(wash your marinated food)!<br />我個個留言一9樣呀﹖文少http://jonathan_sky.mysinablog.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-9293891576457830522013-03-30T16:12:26.079-07:002013-03-30T16:12:26.079-07:00文少,洗版呀?文少,洗版呀?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-85064019043676835112013-03-30T15:58:21.983-07:002013-03-30T15:58:21.983-07:00太過份﹐我唔like陳雲根都要講兩句
雖然話陳雲甩頭髮﹑樣衰兼唔修身﹐係一個客觀事實陳述
不過﹐佢因...太過份﹐我唔like陳雲根都要講兩句<br />雖然話陳雲甩頭髮﹑樣衰兼唔修身﹐係一個客觀事實陳述<br />不過﹐佢因為樣衰搞到溝唔到女﹐要靠叫北姑發泄性慾﹐仲搞到夜晚發綺夢夢見女鬼﹐已經夠慘<br />你地班友竟然仲成日提住﹐仲有無人性啊﹖(爆)文少http://jonathan_sky.mysinablog.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-34716000649140386762013-03-30T15:52:23.669-07:002013-03-30T15:52:23.669-07:00好深﹐即係點﹖
無自我認知能力的﹐唔算係人
有自我認知能力的﹐唔一定算係人﹖
問題返來﹐一個人唔察覺...好深﹐即係點﹖<br />無自我認知能力的﹐唔算係人<br />有自我認知能力的﹐唔一定算係人﹖<br />問題返來﹐一個人唔察覺自己性格上有咩缺點<br />算唔算無自我認知能力﹖<br />定係有﹐不過無運用﹖文少http://jonathan_sky.mysinablog.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-83084471967644575792013-03-30T15:48:02.936-07:002013-03-30T15:48:02.936-07:00你真係...你講到我好似需要你信我咁。(汗)你真係...你講到我好似需要你信我咁。(汗)文少http://jonathan_sky.mysinablog.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-64225202633190608202013-03-30T15:40:46.055-07:002013-03-30T15:40:46.055-07:00建議哲人王找小三﹐便可陷哲人王於不忠之地
呢招夠陰毒
好建議﹐我鍾意。(爆)建議哲人王找小三﹐便可陷哲人王於不忠之地<br />呢招夠陰毒<br />好建議﹐我鍾意。(爆)文少http://jonathan_sky.mysinablog.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-76515320878092389192013-03-30T15:33:43.448-07:002013-03-30T15:33:43.448-07:00好好笑
梁文道還好些少
如果哲人王求的出名
竟然是變成陳雲﹑陶傑﹑鍾祖康這類文壇小丑
我會恥笑他
事...好好笑<br />梁文道還好些少<br />如果哲人王求的出名<br />竟然是變成陳雲﹑陶傑﹑鍾祖康這類文壇小丑<br />我會恥笑他<br />事實上﹐當蔡子強之流也可以學者自居﹐讀左校出身的曹捷也可稱才子﹐是但一條友只要讀多幾年屎片﹐便可靠寫些報紙專欄上位的香港﹐我深信哲人王願自甘墮落的話﹐上位又有何難﹖<br /><br />最重要的一個問題<br />一個學人在世﹐目的在求名﹑還是在求學﹖<br />寫著作﹐為啟迪後世﹐還是求寫甚麼爛鬼成名作﹖<br />有人竟還有臉提羅素﹐他當日寫書﹐是為谷階上位嘛﹖文少http://jonathan_sky.mysinablog.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-15039515193504791302013-03-30T15:09:20.342-07:002013-03-30T15:09:20.342-07:00zpdrmn﹕
//行到水窮處,坐看雲起時//
有幾難﹖水窮處﹐不是解找不到水的地方嘛﹖
直接跑去撒...zpdrmn﹕<br />//行到水窮處,坐看雲起時//<br />有幾難﹖水窮處﹐不是解找不到水的地方嘛﹖<br />直接跑去撒哈拉沙漠即可。<br /><br />至於哲人王行到莫財﹐除非佢有一萬億美金身家﹐否則都係易過借火呀﹖<br />好似我成日陪條女行街﹐佢話買手袋﹐求其一個LV都貴到我發呆...我hi佢auntie﹐個袋可以當夾萬用咩﹖文少http://jonathan_sky.mysinablog.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-91051081677220569452013-03-30T11:17:09.611-07:002013-03-30T11:17:09.611-07:00小子,
I think (but I'm not sure) that he's t...小子,<br />I think (but I'm not sure) that he's talking about neuroscience or related disciplines and (maybe) philosophy based on that.<br />難度過高 maybe interpreted as doing neuroscience research is too difficult for someone outside the discipline. But I don't think to understand the results are too difficult. There are books for laymen written by experts in the field. So, doing philosophy based on neuroscience may not be that difficult. (Well, that's only my guess; I don't really know how difficult these things are.)<br />As for 分析哲學已經是明日黄花, I can't say anything about that. I ain't a philosophy major.<br />--zpdrmnAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-91785664505517238902013-03-30T10:59:45.708-07:002013-03-30T10:59:45.708-07:00//行到水窮處// That's not easy. But I take 水 as mon...//行到水窮處// That's not easy. But I take 水 as money. LoL. --zpdrmnAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com