tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post2728036873935499860..comments2024-03-29T18:19:10.139-07:00Comments on 魚之樂: 維根斯坦的虛榮心Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger35125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-20779716966494356422014-08-17T10:27:56.828-07:002014-08-17T10:27:56.828-07:00很多知識份子在大眾面前再裝作謙虛與懂得欣賞別人,骨子裡都是充滿傲慢與相輕。很多知識份子在大眾面前再裝作謙虛與懂得欣賞別人,骨子裡都是充滿傲慢與相輕。Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-46776350368674858112013-09-02T01:00:28.847-07:002013-09-02T01:00:28.847-07:00It's already in the essay (Rush Rhees (ed), Re...It's already in the essay (Rush Rhees (ed), Recollections of Wittgenstein, p.77)).W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-36590793324050612422013-09-01T23:07:43.217-07:002013-09-01T23:07:43.217-07:00may I know the source, in English, of the Drury qu...may I know the source, in English, of the Drury quote of Wittgenstein attitude toward intellectual vanity? Thanks.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-64993216404548499372013-05-27T22:04:35.451-07:002013-05-27T22:04:35.451-07:00謝謝。看過了,但不肯定文章要表達甚麼。謝謝。看過了,但不肯定文章要表達甚麼。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-25947622301423168352013-05-27T11:37:20.826-07:002013-05-27T11:37:20.826-07:00這是台灣某人對王教授一文的回應。但我不同意他所說的:「只有那些自以為自己原創性很強的傢伙,才會整天神...這是台灣某人對王教授一文的回應。但我不同意他所說的:「只有那些自以為自己原創性很強的傢伙,才會整天神秘兮兮地那麼在意所謂抄襲。」恐怕那些對哲學發展歷史了解皮毛、覺得甚麼都差不多的人,才會說甚麼天下文章一大抄。<br /> <br /> <br />維根斯坦的虛榮心?超譯維根斯坦?一點文字理解的問題 <br />http://csc79.blogspot.tw/2013/05/blog-post_14.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-28101516624833419482013-05-15T10:27:47.985-07:002013-05-15T10:27:47.985-07:00「變本加厲」是指他由一般的懷疑到指名道姓的指責。「變本加厲」是指他由一般的懷疑到指名道姓的指責。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-40486375984478823522013-05-15T10:26:48.247-07:002013-05-15T10:26:48.247-07:00一般而言的確是這樣。一般而言的確是這樣。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-59678323722573088632013-05-15T10:26:30.782-07:002013-05-15T10:26:30.782-07:00Heiman,
為何想起達爾文?Heiman,<br /><br />為何想起達爾文?W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-58558697154475326352013-05-15T10:25:45.349-07:002013-05-15T10:25:45.349-07:00gengar,
//Sense of contribution是人重要的動力//
- 對,但維根...gengar,<br /><br />//Sense of contribution是人重要的動力//<br /><br />- 對,但維根斯坦的問題是他一方面鄙視知識上的虛榮心,另一方面卻又太重視自己的成就是否被人確認,以致變得多疑及容易指責別人抄襲他。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-52625525705235842172013-05-14T23:11:16.824-07:002013-05-14T23:11:16.824-07:00"維根斯坦不是不知道這是虛榮心作祟,卻仍然是不能自已!後來他變本加厲,指名道姓懷疑另一知名..."維根斯坦不是不知道這是虛榮心作祟,卻仍然是不能自已!後來他變本加厲,指名道姓懷疑另一知名哲學家卡爾納普(Rudolf Carnap) 抄襲他"<br /><br />他和Carnap之间的过节要比Philosophical Investigations早很多年吧。“后来变本加厉”这样说似乎不正确?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-58402635576471625122013-05-14T21:18:17.250-07:002013-05-14T21:18:17.250-07:00Meshi,
I though about 哲行 but didn't want to ex...Meshi,<br />I though about 哲行 but didn't want to explain that it's different from a term, named similarly, by 李. -zpdrmnAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-16826372194017589392013-05-14T09:19:40.442-07:002013-05-14T09:19:40.442-07:00教授你覺不覺得虛榮心越大,越容易嫉妒?教授你覺不覺得虛榮心越大,越容易嫉妒?Hinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15406010786911236227noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-58861351653788521252013-05-14T07:30:59.782-07:002013-05-14T07:30:59.782-07:00想起達爾文想起達爾文Heimannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-14568763768934923472013-05-14T05:42:52.381-07:002013-05-14T05:42:52.381-07:00//他生前曾經想過盡快出版此書,就是因為他擔心別的哲學家先他一步,發表了類似的觀點,令他得不到應有的...//他生前曾經想過盡快出版此書,就是因為他擔心別的哲學家先他一步,發表了類似的觀點,令他得不到應有的賞識。//<br /><br />只講《哲學研究》,作為一個作者,喜愛自己的作品,希望自己的心血受人重視,可以帶來新的東西,屬情有可原吧?<br />如果別的哲學家先他一步發表了類似的觀點,這對他來說,可能是心血白費了。<br />Sense of contribution是人重要的動力呢。gengarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03200105680207240451noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-80772287976877652842013-05-14T03:40:29.428-07:002013-05-14T03:40:29.428-07:00(我用「虛榮心」譯 'vanity',這是一般的譯法。)
「實榮」(假定有這個詞語...(我用「虛榮心」譯 'vanity',這是一般的譯法。)<br /><br />「實榮」(假定有這個詞語)應是英文中的「proper pride」;Aristotle 認為是美德(virtue).Allenhttp://www.singakongcheng.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-88181705784075899822013-05-14T00:36:00.609-07:002013-05-14T00:36:00.609-07:00//Maybe we can make up terms like 哲修 and 哲養. //
H...//Maybe we can make up terms like 哲修 and 哲養. //<br /><br />How about 哲道?XD (under the risk of being accused 煽風點火)Meshinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-213841601282533412013-05-14T00:33:02.323-07:002013-05-14T00:33:02.323-07:00I am just an unexceptional philosopher.I am just an unexceptional philosopher.W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-89075705180655429922013-05-14T00:16:47.299-07:002013-05-14T00:16:47.299-07:00Wong Sir,
What is your 原創哲學?
Maybe there will be...Wong Sir,<br /><br />What is your 原創哲學?<br /><br />Maybe there will be a new book "W. Wong in Twentieth One Century Analytic Philosophy" <br /><br />kyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-60346930252844096002013-05-13T23:58:21.618-07:002013-05-13T23:58:21.618-07:00Indeed.Indeed.W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-87865909137141705762013-05-13T23:57:58.243-07:002013-05-13T23:57:58.243-07:00That's clever.That's clever.W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-31175351978486993202013-05-13T23:57:38.339-07:002013-05-13T23:57:38.339-07:00可以讀一讀 P.M.S. Hacker 的 Wittgenstein's Place in ...可以讀一讀 P.M.S. Hacker 的 <i>Wittgenstein's Place in Twentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy</i>。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-29527786261479385982013-05-13T23:56:06.284-07:002013-05-13T23:56:06.284-07:00就算是真有實力的人,假如太過追求名氣,十分介意別人不知道他很勁,那也算是有虛榮心吧。(我用「虛榮心」...就算是真有實力的人,假如太過追求名氣,十分介意別人不知道他很勁,那也算是有虛榮心吧。(我用「虛榮心」譯 'vanity',這是一般的譯法。)W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-42635644504390567172013-05-13T23:55:24.226-07:002013-05-13T23:55:24.226-07:00佢創立左d咩@@"?
個d野對哲學有咩大影響?
(唔係話「邏輯實證主義」同「日常語言哲學」...佢創立左d咩@@"?<br />個d野對哲學有咩大影響?<br />(唔係話「邏輯實證主義」同「日常語言哲學」<br />啊ma...?後期都話係錯左嫁bo)小子noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-48830794820520970222013-05-13T23:51:56.536-07:002013-05-13T23:51:56.536-07:00我有朋友是 Rawls 的學生,他們都說 Rawls 很有修養。我有朋友是 Rawls 的學生,他們都說 Rawls 很有修養。W. Wonghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07161244576570372004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4010478591191633760.post-30255645214553887082013-05-13T23:27:09.395-07:002013-05-13T23:27:09.395-07:00原創性高,影響大之故。原創性高,影響大之故。Yanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05543452661425487649noreply@blogger.com